Myopia Research - Treatment, Prevention, Causes, Correction

Myopia Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Myopia, including details on treatment, prevention, causes, correction.


Myopia Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Myopia

Books on Myopia

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Corneal flap thickness and topography changes induced by flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis.

Güell JL, Velasco F, Roberts C, Sisquella MT, Mahmoud A

Cornea and Refractive Surgery Unit, Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular, Barcelona, Spain.

PURPOSE: To determine the corneal flap thickness profile produced by 3 microkeratomes and the topographic changes induced by flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Cornea and Refractive Surgery Unit, Instituto de Microcirugia Ocular de Barcelona, Autonoma University, Barcelona, Spain. METHODS: In this prospective consecutive nonrandomized comparative study, patients were divided into 2 groups. In Group 1 (75 eyes), 3 microkeratomes were used: Moria LSX One, Moria M2, and Amadeus (AMO); 25 eyes per microkeratome. Pachymetry was measured with a DGH pachymeter in the center of the cornea and 3.0 mm from the center at 4 cardinal points (superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal; 3 measurements at each point) before and after the cut. The flap thickness in each sector was calculated by subtracting the mean post-flap corneal thickness from the mean pre-flap corneal thickness. In Group 2 (33 eyes), the M2 microkeratome with a 130 microm plate was used to create a superotemporal hinged flap (9 eyes) or a superonasal hinged flap (24 eyes). The topographic change induced by the microkeratome cut was evaluated using 4 sequential data acquisitions by the Keratron Scout topographic unit (Optikon) before and immediately after the cut (before laser ablation). Cardinal and oblique astigmatism and change in the axis were calculated by vectorial analysis of the simulated keratometry. Topographic Zernike analysis was performed in a subgroup. RESULTS: With the LSX One microkeratome, the mean flap thickness was 151.7 microm centrally, 161.9 microm superiorly, 151.4 microm inferiorly, 156.1 microm temporally, and 167.5 microm nasally. There was no statistically significant difference between the areas studied (P<.05). With the M2, the mean flap thickness was 131.7 microm centrally, 155.5 microm superiorly, 146.7 microm inferiorly, 143.7 microm temporally, and 160.5 microm nasally. There was a statistically significant difference between flap thickness centrally and in the other areas (P>.05). With the Amadeus microkeratome, the mean flap thickness was 140.0 microm centrally, 152.5 superiorly, 128.5 microm inferiorly, 145.0 microm temporally, and 147.0 microm nasally. Statistically significant differences (P>.05) were found in the 4 sectors of the flap. With vectorial analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between superonasal and superotemporal hinge placement in the cardinal and oblique components but there was a statistically significant difference in the axis change with both placements (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The LSX One microkeratome was the most predictable. A significant difference was noted in all sectors except superiorly with the M2 and in all sectors with the Amadeus. No differences between nasal and superior hinge placement were found with the M2. Topographic Zernike analysis demonstrated a difference in the orientation of the induced coma as a function of hinge position.

Published 21 February 2005 in J Cataract Refract Surg, 31(1): 115-9.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Myopia Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Myopia Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (November)
  Issue 2 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)



Myopia Books

Reversing Nearsightedness (or Myopia)

Reversing Nearsightedness (or Myopia)